Archive for April, 2009

Punishing OxyContin’s Maker

 

 

By Caitlin Sullivan/Abingdon, Virginia

oxycontin_0721

Punishing OxyContin’s Maker
By Caitlin Sullivan/Abingdon, Virginia Friday, Jul. 20, 2007
oxycontin
A crowd of people march to raise awareness about the abuse of Oxycontin in Abingdon, Va., where three current and former executives of the drug’s maker were to be sentenced for misleading the public about its risk of addiction.

Three of pharmaceutical giant Purdue Pharma’s top current and former executives skirted a prison sentence in federal court today, winding up instead with three years probation and 400 hours of community service to serve instead. Federal Judge James P. Jones ordered the maker of the prescription painkiller OxyContin and the three executives to pay a $634.5 million fine for misleading doctors about the narcotic’s risk of addiction. The company had touted the drug as less addictive than more traditional narcotics, despite the fact that the pill can easily be crushed and converted into a powerful street drug.

Michael Friedman, who retired last month as the Connecticut-based company’s president, lawyer Howard Udell and former chief medical officer Dr. Paul Goldenheim had pleaded guilty in May, in return for accepting the fine. The surprise from today’s ruling was the inclusion of the community service penalty — each man will have to serve his 400 hours working in drug abuse prevention or treatment, which would amount two and a half months of 40-hour work weeks spent fulfilling the sentence.

But the big question inside and outside the courthouse today was, does the punishment fit the crime?

It’s an explosive issue here in the southwest Virginia, which like much of Appalachia, had long suffered from a wave of addiction to the drug. More than 100 people gathered at a morning rally in a town park to tell their stories about the prescription drug before moving to the courthouse. In the afternoon, many of them would be in the courtroom, giving victim statements in front of the pharmaceutical executives and the judge.

One woman carried her son’s urn. “You are responsible for killing my son,” she told the three men. “I think jail is too good for you and I think you need to spend some time in a rehab facility, like my son, and maybe you will change your mind. My son’s prepaid college ended up paying for his funeral.”

Those individual costs mounted for communities throughout Appalachia. Federal authorities in Virginia began investigating Purdue about five years ago when crime, addiction and death rates skyrocketed in the mountainous part of the state. “This is a fine of insignificance when we look at the consequences that this drug has had not only in this area but around the country,” said Sister Beth Davies, director of the Addiction Education Center in neighboring Lee County. “No one is being held accountable. The penalty in no way fits the crime.”

Davies said she first took notice of the drug in 1999. By 2001, she said there was such rampant drug abuse that her group, Lee County Coalition for Health, met with Purdue Pharma and asked the company to recall and reformat the drug. She said the company particularly targeted southwestern Virginia because of its high Medicaid and disability rates. A lot of coal miners suffered from pain, for example, and they were among the prime targets of Purdue’s risky marketing. “This has changed the face of Appalachia,” Davies said. “The foster care rate, the crime rate, we never had any of this until OxyContin came in.”

Purdue, which was represented earlier on in its negotiations with the government by Rudy Giuliani, did admit to mislabeling the drug from 1996-2001. But how much responsibility does a drug company bear for the bad decisions that individuals make, particularly after the criminal crackdown on OxyContin abuse began? In the end, questions like that may have kept the executives out of prison.

As for the monetary fine, $634.5 million is a record sum, but considering that OxyContin continues to be wildly profitable (though more carefully advertised and regulated), it won’t be a crippling blow to Purdue. The company has, after all, earned over $2.8 billion from OxyContin since the drug was first introduced, including $595 million in OxyContin earnings in 2006 alone.

But in Abingdon today, it is clear that this fight has become personal — in part, it’s a story of people who feel deeply wronged by powerful outsiders. Elsie Gray, who had driven two hours from her home to stand in the rain for the victims’ rally, is one of the aggrieved. Her son, a former coal miner, is serving a 15-year prison sentence after being caught with two OxyContin pills and 2.4 grams of cocaine. She was angered that the fines were mostly going to state and federal Medicaid fraud or other health programs, not specifically to rehab programs. And now she feels like these executives would just go back up north with less of a sentence then they deserved. “They should do some community service in our state,” she said. “They should go to a rehab here.”

Support, drugs, Help with drugs, rehabilitation

The Health Effects of Teen Alcohol Use

There has been many studies conducted on the health effects of both short-term and long-term use of alcohol among adults.  Long-term risks inlcude liver damage, pancreatitis, certain cancers, and literal shrinkage of the brain.  Alcohol use is the second leading cause of dementia; one simple ages quicker on alcohol. (3)  But professionals today are worried about a steady increase in teen alcohol abuse and the possible negative health effects.  According to an article published by the British Medical Association (BMA) entitled:  “Alcohol and Young People”, “…there was a general rise in the proportion of 11 to 15 year-olds who drink alcohol regularly, but also there is an increase in the amount they are drinking on each occasion.”

Adolescence is a transition time when the body is undergoing many significant changes, such as hormonal alterations and brain development.  It is also a time when young people start to associate more with friends and associates beyond their childhood contacts.  They feel an increased pressure to ‘fit in’ or ‘go along with the crowd’ in order to be accepted socially. These new circumstances can be confusing and difficult for the youth to understand and deal with.  Often their ability to make correct or safe decisions is also at a stage of immaturity. Exposing the brain to alcohol during this period may interrupt key processes of brain development, possibly leading to mild cognitive impairment as well as to a further escalation of drinking.
Alcohol is absorbed very rapidly into the blood stream from the stomach lining, in as short a time as 5 to 10 minutes and it’s effects last for several hours depending on the amount ingested and how quickly it was consumed.  Females absorb alcohol faster than males because their bodies contain less water.  The water dilutes the alcohol and so the same amount of alcohol will produce a higher concentration in the blood.  After consuming only 2 to 3 normal strength beers, or 4 or 5 standard glasses of wine, most people will feel less inhibited and more relaxed.  Anything consumed after this amount most people slur their speech and become less coordinated and clumsy.  Some people have increased emotional reactions.  More alcohol could result in staggering, double vision, and loss of balance, nausea, vomiting and an impression of the room spinning.
According to information issued from the U. S. government publication entitled Prevention Alert, teen alcohol abuse showed many negative side effects. “Subtle alcohol-induced adolescent learning impairments could affect academic and occupational achievement.  In one study……short-term memory skills were evaluated in alcohol-dependent and nondependent adolescents ages 15 and 16.  The alcohol-dependent youth had greater difficulty remembering words and simple geometric designs after a 10-minute interval.  In this and similar studies memory problems were most common among adolescents in treatment who had experienced alcohol withdrawal symptoms.  The emergence of withdrawal symptoms generally indicates an established pattern of heavy drinking.  Their appearance at a young age underscores the need for early intervention to prevent and treat underage drinking. Early alcohol use may have long lasting consequences.  People who begin drinking before age 15 are four times more likely to develop alcohol dependence at some time in their lives compared with those who have their first drink at age 20 or older.  It is not clear whether starting to drink at an early age actually causes alcoholism.  Environmental factors may also be involved, especially in alcoholic families, where children may start drinking earlier because of easier access to alcohol in the home, family acceptance of drinking and lack of parental monitoring.
Aside from the fact that underage drinking is illegal, it poses a high risk to both the individual and society.  We will discuss some of the consequences of teen alcohol abuse.
drunk-lady

TEENS Drinking and Driving

Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among youth ages 15 to 20.  The rate of fatal crashes among alcohol-involved drivers between 16 and 20 years old is more than twice the rate for alcohol-involved drivers 21 and older.brain